innovation

RECENT POSTS

Science and Development Network: Innovation at the Grassroots

The Science and Development Network news site has produced an excellent series of articles Innovation at the Grassroots examining how creative folks in the developing world are solving their own problems.

As SciDev.net editor David Dickson says in the introductory article:

Efforts to promote sustainable development must tap into technologies developed locally, driven by community needs and priorities.

The products of modern science and technology (S&T), from chemical pesticides to carbon-emitting combustion engines, are frequently blamed — with some justification — for the unsustainable use of the planet’s resources.

At the same time S&T offers a variety of tools for sustainable development — from forms of pest control that work with, rather than against, natural ecosystems, to cost-effective devices for producing renewable energy.

This creates a dilemma. We cannot reject technological tools in the quest for a sustainable future. But equally, without a radical transformation of how society defines and uses S&T, current patterns of growth and use of resources are unlikely to change.

I’m not a big fan of the word “innovation,” in that it has come to mean almost anything. But this series has a fairly focused definition and is making a good point — that all kinds of efforts in development, including innovation and invention, do best when they are nurtured from within the community rather than imported.

USAID infographic on using “household items” to fight global poverty

The U.S. Agency for International Development, USAID, run by former Gates Foundation program manager Rajiv Shah, is trying to upgrade its approach to fighting global poverty by encouraging innovation.

In case you haven’t noticed, we are now in the Geek phase of global health and development.

In a new infographic, USAID attempts to provide more specific examples to illustrate some good examples of what it means by celebrating innovation as a means to improving people’s lives in poor countries. Continue reading

Gates Foundation funds BBC global health TV

BBC

The logo for the BBC's new Gates-funded program

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has funded another media outlet, something called the BBC, to do a television show on global health.

The Gates Foundation is funding a lot of media these days.

I’ve written about this before, including when ABC News launched a Gates-funded series and then a few days later after talking with some of the media folks at the philanthropy about concerns many had raised regarding potential conflicts of interest (since the Gates Foundation does global health). NPR, I should note, has also received funding from the Gates Foundation.

Here’s what The Media Online reports today about the new Gates-BBC program:

A television health show supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation launched on BBC World News last week. The 26-part weekly magazine programme, called The Health Show, reports on global health issues from areas vulnerable to specific conditions.

Ah, The Health Show. Clever name. I wasn’t quite sure what “areas vulnerable to specific conditions” meant. Continue reading

Stupid contest identifies confusion: World’s top 40 development innovators

Which 40 organizations are most innovative when it comes international development?

An organization called Devex (which appears to be a jobs network for aid and development workers) said it polled thousands of people working in foreign aid and development to answer that incredibly vague question.

It’s incredibly vague because the words “innovation” and “development” can be taken to mean almost anything.

But lack of clarity didn’t stop them from declaring the Devex Top 40 innovators in development.

Among the winners: Amnesty International, Greenpeace, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Deloitte Consulting (the tax and financial advisers), an international construction consulting firm called AECOM (which recently took on Col. Gaddafi’s son as an intern), Booz Allen Hamilton (which mostly works on defense and homeland security stuff)…. What the hell?

Notably absent from this list is, uh, our nation’s (and, arguably, the world’s) foremost aid and development organization, USAID. Off the top of my head, I’d also say Seattle-based PATH is perhaps more innovative when it comes to fighting global poverty and disease than the tax advisers at Deloitte.

You can probably think of other notables missing from this list.

So, yeah, it’s a stupid and meaningless contest and list. So what?

I mention it only because I like words to mean something.

Innovation is a term used a lot these days and yet nobody seems to know what it means.

More importantly, if accountants and advisers to defense contractors can win a contest aimed it identifying innovative leaders in international development, the field of development needs better definition as well.