Muhammad Yunus

RECENT POSTS

What will it mean if microfinance pioneer is ousted?

Tom Paulson

Muhammad Yunus visits with fans Seattle Town Hall May 2010

Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist who pioneered the anti-poverty strategy of microfinance, is being pressured by Bangladeshi politicians to “retire” as head of the Grameen Bank — the financial institution he set up some 30 years ago to provide small loans to the poor.

The politicians say they think it’s time Yunus, age 70, moved on and turned over the bank to someone younger to carry on its mission.

Yunus and his supporters, however, say this is a politically motivated move to reduce the out-spoken economist’s influence and also allow government takeover of Grameen Bank.

Whatever is driving this tussle, I think it’s fair to say the field of microfinance, or microcredit, is at a critical turning point today. Maybe you could even say it’s in a crisis, an identity crisis.

As Yunus sees it, microfinance is now at the center of a battle between those who want to use the practice primarily to help the poor as against those who see it as a means to make money while also perhaps helping the poor.

Put another way, you could say it’s about “doing well by doing good” versus “doing really, really well for yourself by appearing to do good for others.”

Turns out, there’s serious money to be made in microfinance. Yunus has been quite outspoken as a critic of those who seek to profit off microfinance, which some say may have something to do with why he’s now under attack.

Given the uncertain future of microfinance — whether it can (or does) work as a means to lift people out of poverty and if it can do so while also making people money — it seems like the outcome of this political power struggle in Bangladesh could have global ramifications.

Yunus Watch: Microfinance pioneer further piled on

World Economic Forum

Muhammad Yunus

I’m sorry to reveal a bias here, but all these attacks and critiques of the Bangladeshi economist and Nobel Peace Prize-winning pioneer of microfinance, Muhammad Yunus, appear to be so obviously opportunistic (if not an outright smear campaign), I can’t figure out why smart people just keep piling on.

As I’ve written about before on this blog, Yunus has come under heavy attack — accused of being a crook, of libeling politicians (is that possible?) and all sorts of wrong-doings — after publicly taking a stand against those who would make a profit off providing loans to the very poor.

The latest example of piling on comes from Matthew Bishop, a top business editor at The Economist and author of the popular book (and blog of the same name) “Philanthrocapitalism.” Continue reading

Microfinance pioneer, after attacking profit-seekers, is counterattacked

World Economic Forum

Muhammad Yunus

The man, and Nobel laureate, who for more than 30 years has been celebrated as one of the world’s leading anti-poverty champions is fending off allegations of improper financial behavior.

Economist Muhammad Yunus won the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize for pioneering, through the Bangladeshi lending organization Grameen Bank, the anti-poverty scheme known as microcredit or microfinance.

As I’ve reported on here over the past few months, the field of microfinance has fallen into a crisis due to allegations of excessive profit-seeking, political manipulation and a general shift from its image as a noble experiment aimed at helping the poor to a scheme aimed at exploiting the poor. Continue reading

Former microfinancier Unitus issues vague statement on closure

Flickr, TW Collins

The local microfinance firm Unitus, which abruptly closed up shop and laid off its employees this summer after coming into a financial windfall, has issued a long-awaited statement that it had promised would explain its actions.

It is a statement, but not that explanatory — either on why the organization closed so suddenly and what they intend to do with profits some individuals earned on an investment that was supposed to be about helping the poor.

Maybe that’s why they issued it today, a month later than promised, since people are frantically focused on the holidays and unlikely to pay much attention to anything else. Am I being cynical? Sorry about that.

As Clay Holtzman of the Puget Sound Business Journal notes today in his column Unitus Board: Still Weighing Options, the statement lacks answers to some of the more disturbing questions about personal gain at Unitus and, almost half a year later, still doesn’t even really explain why they urgently decided to close/reorganize:

Five months after abruptly announcing plans to shut down and reorganize their Seattle-based microcredit charity, the four founding board members behind Unitus are still determining their next step.
Clay’s story is the best summary out right now, so read that and some of his earlier detailed posts on the Unitus transformation. He and Kristi Heim of the Seattle Times (who is on vacation right now), have done an excellent job of covering this story and trying to puzzle out what’s going on at Unitus.
Here are some of my earlier posts not focused so much on Unitus as it is on the overall crisis in microfinance, which stems from a concern it is becoming a get-rich scheme for some rather than an anti-poverty scheme as originally devised by Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus.

Microfinance flap keeps getting weirder

World Economic Forum

Muhammad Yunus

There is a crisis in the anti-poverty scheme microfinance, centered in India but reverberating globally.

I posted on the local implications of this mess in October, before it exploded in India but back when there were signs of trouble. I’ve tried to keep up as it has gotten more intense and weirder by the moment.

In the latest (even weirder) turn of events, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning pioneer of microfinance, Muhammad Yunus, has been accused of embezzling funds based upon allegations made by a Norwegian documentary filmmaker who has taken a critical look at the whole microcredit movement. Continue reading

Don’t be too quick to blame politicians, or the poor, for India’s microfinance crisis

Flickr, TW Collins

As loyal readers of this blog know, I’ve been watching and reporting on the increasing turmoil in the Indian microfinance industry for a while now.

How this flap in India plays out could have profound implications for a number of Seattle organizations and many others elsewhere that promote microfinance as a tool for reducing global poverty.

Today, the New York Times reports that “India Microcredit Faces Collapse from Defaults” and says:

India’s rapidly growing private microcredit industry faces imminent collapse as almost all borrowers in one of India’s largest states have stopped repaying their loans, egged on by politicians who accuse the industry of earning outsize profits on the backs of the poor.

This approach reminded me of the early days reporting on America’s sub-prime loan crisis. Continue reading

Microfinance, subprime loans and baseball

Flickr, TW Collins

Is Microfinance the New Subprime?

That’s the provocative title of a new article in the Harvard Business Review by financial journalist Barbara Kiviat and New York University economist (and author of Portfolios of the Poor) Jonathan Morduch.

The subtext of the question is the implication that, like those sub-prime mortgage loans in the U.S. that turned out to be a catastrophic house of cards, some approaches to microfinance are starting to also look like another way for financial whizzes to make money off poor people.

I’ve been posting for the past few weeks on this increasingly heated debate surrounding “profit-maximizing” microfinance and the resulting turmoil in the field. It’s a debate that many organizations in Seattle, where microfinance is big, are watching keenly. Continue reading

Turmoil in microfinance continues

Flickr, TW Collins

The struggle for the image, if not the soul, of microfinance continues.

Overview: Microfinance was created to help the poor by Muhammad Yunus, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for the scheme. Since then, many others have adopted it and some have changed the approach to become more profit-oriented — arguing that this will lead to more investment in microfinance funds and thus more money for the poor.

Not surprisingly, you gotta be careful mixing the profit motive with helping poor people. Yunus is not happy with this trend. Others think it’s a needed change. Continue reading